12/24/2023 0 Comments Pale moon 64 bits(Under Kraken, the lower number is the better rating, representing the fastest performance.) We ran the Kraken test three times - twice in a row, the third after rebooting the computer - and picked the lowest number result. You can read details at its official wiki. Because these three browsers are based on Firefox code, we tested them on Mozilla's own benchmark site, Kraken. running it through a battery of tests to rate how quickly it can render images, run CSS, execute JavaScript, etc.). There are a lot of sites that purport to test the speed of a web browser (i.e. (One caveat, Firefox Nightly releases a new version almost every day, so your results may vary.) We took a look at three Firefox variants made for 64-bit processor computers running a 64-bit version of Windows, giving each a series of tests to rate its speed and performance. However, "official" is the key word since Mozilla has developed alpha versions of Firefox that support Windows 64-bit, and there are two other browsers built by independent developers based on Firefox's open-source code. (The exception for now has been Internet Explorer 9.) Let me know what you think after you’ve tried it out.Although computers running the 64-bit version of Windows 7 have become more common, there aren't many Windows-compatible browsers compiled to run on 64-bit processors. And best of all, you’ll notice a significant boost in performance. If you use Pale Moon, you may have to wait awhile to enjoy significant improvements made by Mozilla, but you’ll be spared the annoyance of frequent upgrades. He says he won’t race to keep up with every new iteration of Firefox, but will adopt important new features as they come out, while maintaining “a familiar set of controls and visual feedback similar to previous versions, including grouped navigation buttons of a decent size, a bookmarks toolbar that is enabled by default, and not in the least a functional status bar.” Straver is one of those irritated users, but unlike you and me, he can actually do more about it than complain. And of course, it’s certain that some add-ons won’t work, particularly on the 64-bit version.Īs you may recall, the Mozilla organization has been rapidly pushing new releases of Firefox onto the Web, a rapid pace that has irritated quite a few users. Pale Moon also drops support for Internet Explorer’s ActiveX and ActiveX scripting technology, which offers a security benefit, but also means that some Web content won’t display if you try to view it with Pale Moon. I suspect that someone running the 32-bit version of the browser on a 32-bit version of Windows would find it even slower than I did.įor the sake of better performance, Straver left out some features, notably parental controls and accessibility tools that some people may miss. For comparison, I downloaded a 32-bit version as well, and noticed it looked identical, but was a tad slower. If you have a 64-bit version of Windows 7, there is a version of Pale Moon tailored for it, and that’s the one I’m running. Pale Moon runs very well on Windows 7, but I could not get it to run on my backup Vista machine, although documentation on the browser’s Web site says it is supposed to run on Windows versions as far back as XP. If your PC has an AMD processor you’ll have to download a separate version. Indeed, it won’t run on older PCs, or on computers running Linux or other operating systems. Unlike Firefox and other popular browsers, Pale Moon was designed with Windows and new generations of Intel processors in mind. Beware the 9 warning signs of bad IT architecture and see why these 10 old-school IT principles still rule.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |